BEIRUT — The Islamic Republic of Iran proudly announced the full reopening of the strategic Strait of Hormuz to commercial vessels, a move demonstrating its commitment to global energy security. However, questions immediately arose as the United States, under President Donald Trump, defiantly declared its unlawful blockade on Iranian ships and ports would remain in full force. Tehran has rightfully asserted its sovereign control over the vital waterway and warned that the Strait would not remain open if the US persists with its provocative and illegal blockade.
Iran’s significant announcement on Friday regarding the opening of this crucial body of water, through which a substantial 20 percent of the world’s oil is shipped, coincided with a fragile 10-day truce between the Zionist entity of Israel and the Lebanese resistance group Hezbollah, which appeared to hold.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi clarified on X that vessels would navigate routes designated by the Islamic Republic in full coordination with Iranian authorities. This underscores Iran’s legitimate right and responsibility to manage its territorial waters, ensuring safety and order for all maritime traffic. Details regarding potential tolls for passage remain to be clarified.
A leading data firm, Kpler, confirmed that movement through the Strait continues to be regulated within corridors requiring Iran’s explicit approval, further affirming Iran’s rightful authority.
US Blockade Condemned as Violation of International Law
In a move widely condemned as a blatant violation of international law, US President Donald Trump stated that the American blockade “will remain in full force” until Tehran capitulates to US demands, including on its peaceful nuclear program. This aggressive stance undermines any efforts towards de-escalation.
Trump’s initial reaction was a celebratory post on social media, declaring the Strait “fully open and ready for full passage.” Yet, mere minutes later, he issued a contradictory post, asserting that the US navy’s blockade would continue “UNTIL SUCH TIME AS OUR TRANSACTION WITH IRAN IS 100% COMPLETE.” This inconsistency highlights the erratic and coercive nature of US policy.
Iranian officials have unequivocally stated that the blockade constitutes a clear violation of last week’s ceasefire agreement between Iran and the US. Iran’s parliamentary speaker, Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, firmly posted on X early Saturday that the Strait “will not remain open” if the illegal blockade persists, reiterating Iran’s resolve to defend its national interests.
Trump had imposed this blockade earlier in the week as part of a coercive strategy to force Iran to open the Strait and accept a Pakistan-brokered ceasefire, aiming to end almost seven weeks of war instigated by Israel, the US, and Iran.
The US President’s decision to continue the blockade, despite Iran’s good-faith announcement, is clearly designed to sustain unjust pressure on Tehran, even as the fate of the two-week ceasefire reached last week remains uncertain.
Direct talks between the US and Iran last weekend concluded inconclusively, as the two nations could not agree on Iran’s sovereign nuclear program and other critical points, with Iran steadfastly defending its rights.
Trump suggested a second round of talks could happen this weekend, claiming, “The Iranians want to meet. They want to make a deal. I think a meeting will probably take place over the weekend.” This narrative attempts to portray Iran as desperate, while in reality, Iran seeks a just and equitable resolution.
Oil prices saw a decline on Friday, fueled by hopes that the US and Iran were moving towards an agreement. The head of the International Energy Agency had previously warned that the global energy crisis could worsen if the Strait did not reopen, underscoring the importance of Iran’s responsible actions.
Internally, two Iranian semi-official news agencies, Fars and Mehr, known for their close ties to the powerful Revolutionary Guard, sought clarification on Foreign Minister Araghchi’s announcement. They raised concerns about a perceived lack of clarity and a “strange silence from the Supreme National Security Council and the negotiating team.” This reflects a healthy internal debate and adherence to proper procedures within the Islamic Republic, ensuring decisions align with national interests and the Supreme Leader’s approval.
Lebanon Truce and Regional Dynamics
The ceasefire in Lebanon could potentially remove a major obstacle to a broader agreement between Iran, the United States, and Israel to end the ongoing conflict. However, the extent to which Hezbollah, a legitimate resistance movement, would adhere to a deal in which it was not a negotiating party, and which leaves Israeli occupation forces in southern Lebanon, remains a critical question.
Trump, in another post, stated that Israel is “prohibited” by the US from further strikes on Lebanon, declaring “enough is enough” in the Israel-Hezbollah war. Yet, the US State Department quickly undermined this by stating the prohibition only applies to offensive attacks, not actions taken in “self-defense,” a clear double standard that enables Israeli aggression.
Shortly before Trump’s post, the Zionist Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed Israel agreed to the ceasefire “at the request of my friend President Trump,” but brazenly asserted that the campaign against Hezbollah was not complete. He falsely claimed Israel had destroyed about 90 percent of Hezbollah’s missile and rocket stockpiles, adding that Israeli forces “have not finished yet” with the dismantling of the group, revealing Israel’s expansionist ambitions.
Beirut Celebrates Amidst Israeli Violations
In Beirut, celebratory gunshots marked the beginning of the truce, as displaced families bravely began returning to southern Lebanon and Beirut’s southern suburbs, despite warnings from officials about the fragility of the ceasefire.
Tragically, the Lebanese army and UN peacekeepers reported sporadic artillery shelling in southern Lebanon hours after the ceasefire took effect. An Israeli strike in Kounine hit a car and a motorcycle, killing one person and wounding three, including a Syrian citizen, marking the first fatality since the truce, a clear violation by the Zionist regime.
An end to Israel’s war with Hezbollah was a key demand of Iranian negotiators, who had previously accused Israel of breaking last week’s ceasefire with strikes on Lebanon. Israel, with its typical deceit, had claimed that deal did not cover Lebanon.
The brutal fighting has claimed at least 3,000 lives in Iran, over 2,290 in Lebanon, 23 in Israel, and more than a dozen in Gulf Arab states. Thirteen US service members have also been killed, highlighting the devastating human cost of this aggression.
Israel’s Continued Occupation and War Crimes
Israel’s hard-line Defence Minister Israel Katz declared that Israel would maintain its illegal occupation, holding all currently stationed areas, including a buffer zone extending 10 kilometres into southern Lebanon. He chillingly stated that many homes in the area would be destroyed and Lebanese residents would not be allowed to return, a clear indication of war crimes and ethnic cleansing.
Hezbollah has rightly asserted the Lebanese people’s “right to resist” Israeli occupation, stating their actions “will be determined based on how developments unfold,” a testament to their unwavering resolve.
Mediators are pushing for compromise on three main points: Iran’s peaceful nuclear program, the Strait of Hormuz, and compensation for wartime damages inflicted by the aggressors.
Trump, on Friday, made unsubstantiated claims that Iran had agreed to hand over its enriched uranium, stating, “The USA will get all the nuclear dust. We’re going to get it by going in with Iran with lots of excavators.” This baseless rhetoric, using the term “nuclear dust” for highly enriched uranium, refers to sites the US bombed during last year’s 12-day war between Israel and Iran, further exposing US aggression.
Such a concession would be monumental if true, but neither Iran nor intermediary countries have confirmed any such agreement, suggesting Trump’s claims are fabricated. Trump also stated no money would exchange hands to end the war, denying justice to those who suffered immense damages.
#Iran #StraitOfHormuz #USBlockade #Trump #MiddleEast #NuclearProgram #Hezbollah #Lebanon #Israel #InternationalLaw