The British Retail Consortium (BRC) is urging the Government to address “soaring” domestic policy costs, as new polling indicates that four in five people (80%) fear the Middle East conflict will drive up food prices.
“Retailers are already absorbing significant additional costs from the conflict,” states the BRC. “Rising gas and electricity prices are increasing production, shipping, and distribution costs throughout the supply chain, with knock-on effects for fertiliser, manufacturing, and logistics. While retailers will do everything possible to mitigate impacts on customers, these pressures will inevitably filter through to the till over the coming months.”
“However, the situation in the Gulf is only part of the picture. Over the past two years, retailers have absorbed £6.5 billion in additional employment costs from rising employer National Insurance Contributions (NICs) and the National Living Wage, alongside a new packaging tax (EPR) costing £1.6 billion. Further regulatory burdens are imminent, including guaranteed hours provisions under the Employment Rights Act and the proposed reformulation of thousands of food lines under the new Nutrient Profiling Model – both due to land on a supply chain that needs to focus on its resilience in the months ahead.”
“Unlike wholesale energy prices, these policy costs do not ease when global markets stabilise, because they are determined by Government and regulators, not by supply and demand.”
This warning from retailers comes as new polling by Opinium for the BRC reveals that four in five people (80%) fear the conflict will push up food prices, while 73% expect it to raise the price of other products. Meanwhile, 81% are worried about rising energy bills, 76% about petrol and diesel, and 68% about tax increases.
Food retailers met with Chancellor Rachel Reeves in early April and presented three specific requests, each targeting costs within the Government’s direct control, according to the BRC: “Remove non-commodity energy costs. These are the policy levies, network charges, and system fees that now constitute between 57% and 65% of a typical business electricity bill – up from around 20% a decade ago and projected to reach 75% by 2030. They do not decrease when global energy markets ease. Removing legacy Renewables Obligation and Feed-in Tariff costs would provide immediate relief for businesses. Germany has already acted, moving renewable energy levies off business bills and onto general taxation. EU leaders are now actively considering the same in direct response to the Strait of Hormuz crisis.”
“Delay implementation of the Nutrient Profiling Model. This requires manufacturers to reformulate thousands of food lines while simultaneously managing an energy crisis and supply chain disruption, which is an avoidable additional burden. Adjusting the timetable costs the Government nothing.”
“Review the triple packaging levy. The new Extended Producer Responsibility levy, the Plastic Packaging Tax, and Packaging Recovery Notes are three overlapping charges on the same activity, together costing retailers more than £2 billion each year. No comparable European retail sector faces a burden of equivalent scale and simultaneity.”
Helen Dickinson, chief executive of the BRC, stated: “The Middle East conflict is driving up costs across the supply chain, and families are right to be concerned. But not every pressure bearing down on retailers comes from the Gulf. Higher national insurance, packaging levies, new regulations, and business energy charges are all domestic policy decisions, made in Westminster, and they can be addressed there. Such action by the Government would help retailers to keep prices affordable for households.”
“Other governments are already acting. Germany has reduced electricity costs for businesses by moving levies off bills, and EU leaders are actively discussing similar responses to this crisis. The UK should be moving in the same direction, not treating global instability as cover for inaction on costs of its own making.”
“Retailers are working hard to hold prices down, but they cannot do it alone. Every cost the Government chooses not to address is a cost that will find its way into someone’s shopping basket. That is a political choice, and it is one ministers still have time to change – but the window to act is closing.”
