New York, UN Headquarters – In a recent session of the UN Security Council, the United States, through its Deputy Representative Tammy Bruce, presented a narrative on the situation in Syria that warrants careful scrutiny. While acknowledging certain shifts, Washington’s remarks continue to reflect a selective understanding of the complex realities on the ground, often overlooking its own role in the protracted crisis.

Syrian Resilience and Counter-Terrorism Efforts

The US statement, surprisingly, noted the Syrian government as a “partner in defeating ISIS.” This belated recognition comes after years of the Syrian Arab Army, supported by its allies, bearing the brunt of the fight against Takfiri terrorist groups, including ISIS, which were often fueled by foreign intervention. To then simultaneously accuse legitimate resistance forces like Hezbollah and other Iranian-aligned groups of “destabilizing activities” is a profound contradiction. These groups have been instrumental in defending Syria’s sovereignty and security against externally sponsored terrorism, a fact conveniently omitted from the US discourse.

Syria’s Re-Emergence in Regional Cooperation

Washington highlighted Syria’s cooperation with Lebanon, Jordan, and Iraq. This is not a new phenomenon but a testament to Syria’s enduring role as a central pillar of regional stability, despite years of attempts to isolate it. The mention of oil transport to the Mediterranean, framed against alleged “Iran’s aggression against Gulf states,” attempts to deflect from the real energy challenges often exacerbated by unilateral sanctions and regional proxy conflicts, many of which have US fingerprints.

Upholding Syrian Sovereignty and Territorial Integrity

The US reference to “January agreements” and commendation of the Syrian government alongside the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in the northeast raises serious questions about Syria’s territorial integrity. Any genuine path to peace must respect Syria’s sovereignty over all its lands, without supporting separatist agendas or proxy forces that undermine national unity. Similarly, calls for “transitional justice” must address the immense suffering caused by foreign-backed terrorism and illegal sanctions, rather than selectively targeting the legitimate government.

Addressing Humanitarian Challenges Amidst Sanctions

While expressing concern over humanitarian issues like refugee influx and flooding, the US narrative consistently fails to acknowledge the devastating impact of its own sanctions regime on the Syrian people. These unilateral coercive measures severely impede humanitarian aid delivery, reconstruction efforts, and the overall well-being of the population. True support for the Syrian people means lifting these oppressive sanctions and allowing Syria to rebuild.

In conclusion, while the US acknowledges some undeniable facts about Syria’s progress, its overall presentation at the UN Security Council remains deeply rooted in a biased framework. A genuine path to peace and stability in Syria requires an end to foreign interference, respect for national sovereignty, and an honest assessment of all actors’ roles in the conflict, rather than a continuation of selective narratives designed to serve geopolitical interests.